Friday, September 29, 2006

The first Muslim Jihad

Great point from Luminous Miseries

Three hundred years before the first crusade, Muslim jihad invaded Spain and held it for eight hundred years ... they have never apologized.

Jose Maria Aznar, prime minister of Spain from 1996 to 2004, speaking in Washington, D.C., on September 22, pointed out that Muslims have never apologized for their jihad against Spain, or for any jihad, but still demand apologies whenever they feel offended by remarks by non-Muslims. "It's absurd," Aznar said.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

See this sublime post on fighting the war on Christmas early

Really a fantastic post by Owen of the Luminous Miseries blog about a friend who starts to celebrate Christmas early. It is just poetic.

How to respond when someone says "Happy Holidays"

A few posts ago on this page, Gayle declared war on the anti-Christmas crowd!

Here is a suggestion about how to push the point. Works best on liberal store clerks and wait staff who don't have an audience.

Them: Happy Holidays

You: I celebrate Christmas. What do you celebrate?

Them: Solstice.

You: Happy Solstice (thought balloon: You Pagan Idiot).

You Waiting.....

You: I celebrate Christmas.

You Waiting.....

Them, chickening out: Merry Christmas Then.

You: Merry Christmas to you, too. (thought balloon: You pagan traitor.)

They start early to take away Christmas.

To give you an idea of how early the Christmas season starts for business, (way earlier than this), I got an email yesterday from a company selling materials for "Your Happy Holidays Party." So it is not too soon to start talking on your blogs about the war on Christmas and, incidentally, the war on Hanukkah, also.

At the same time the left is using its favorite tactic (law) to sue the dickens out of anyone who uses the word Christmas, it is also whipping up hysteria among Jewish leftists that, somehow, saying "Happy" Hanukkah is an attempt to make Hanukkah a little Christmas.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Muslim religious rights

Contrast the left's war on Christmas, an effort to remove every mention of Christ in public and private, with the left's perverse fixation on Muslim religious rights.

According to The LA TIMES the army staff at Gitmo has a big job avoiding leftist law suits over the rights of Muslims. The staff works round the clock to during Ramadan making sure the sweet thangs have every little morsel just perfectly prepared and ensuring that no impure Muslim hand ever touches their precious Koran.

All we want is to say Merry Christmas and that appears to be too damn much to ask.

Merry Christmas -- It's okay to say it!

Monday, September 25, 2006

MERRY CHRISTMAS: It's okay to say it!

The left has Google-bombed the phrase "war on Christmas" and I would like to urge all conservative bloggers to start writing articles now using the word Christmas to fight the left's war on Christmas. Be sure to use that phrase all you can. It's best to start now, well ahead of the the Anti-Christmas Season that begins on Thanksgiving.

Be sure to link to if you can.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Bill Clinton on not waging war

"The reason I didn't do anything is that I just couldn't cut through the red tape."

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Wacky worm

Weird one, eh? Looks like the little fella has a plastic suit on.

Anyone have any ideas. Those yellow eyes are his butt. The other side was the side that was eating a tree leaf.

Get a gun. The latest insult.

My itunes list now labels as EXPLICIT those insidious songs like "All Creatures of our God and King."

No shit.

This would be funny if I weren't on the paranoid express. What gives here? If this is some liberal's idea of a joke, it's not funny. Even 50 Cent has some CLEAN labels on iTunes store (that is hard to believe, too). But the London Philharmonic is labeled EXPLICIT on my iTunes music list. Unbelievable!

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Will we be able to get the Democrats to defend America?

The Democrats think that if we just set up some Aid To Dependent Children programs, the Muslims will be happy and go away. We can't get them to defend America as long as they think the problem is just that we haven't sufficiently greased the palm of the Arab poor.

We can't get them to help us defend America as long as they hate it.

We can't get them to help us defend America as long as they think talking to a Muslim will solve the problem.

Indeed, they will probably continue to actively work against the defense of America, even to the detriment of their own interests, until it becomes deadly clear they will be the first to go.

:::Rosie O'Donnell blindfolded in a burkha preparing to have her head chopped off.

:::Will she pray for the intercession of a few Pentecostals?

I am thinking that the Democrats will not defend America until 1. They are in power, and 2. They try talking to terrorists, and 3. There is a hellacious nuclear attack on one of the coasts. Middle America won't be enough. They will like that.

What do YOU think it will take to get the Democrats to defend America?

What better place to be paranoid than a blog?

Amazon has recently been unable to tell what kind of books I would be interested in. Here, they tell me of this great book by Barry Lind because, hey, I bought something by David Horowitz.

This doesn't follow.

Note, however, that they have Barry Lind's politics down precisely. He's the most famous atheist in America and Amazon knows it. No one should call the man "reverend." It's a joke.

You know, I looked over my old Amazon emails and it seems, Amazon COULD tell what my political, reading preferences were in 2005. But in 2006, they seem to be baffled.

Granted, I did buy "Crunchy Cons", which is a liberal book by a liberal masquerading as a conservative. His masquerade did NOT fool Amazon! They followed up with suggestions for anti-Bush materials.

But this recent inability of Amazon to utterly fail to know my politics. Seems strange. Seems calculated. But I'm getting paranoid.

Monday, September 18, 2006

A test of Rosie's thesis

Rosie O'Donnell says Christian fundamentalists are just a dangerous as Muslims!

To test this thesis, I propose that Madonna mock Mohammed as she is mocking Christ on a cross in her new concert.

Let's see who kills her first.

But, you know, this is funny because we know the Muslims will go after her, but, why not a Christian? Maybe if Christians start lopping off heads, we'll get the liberals on our side.

Just a thought.

PS I never actually saw Madonna's face until this cross thing came up and now I am astonished at how ugly the woman is. Sheesh.

Reminder to liberals regarding the Pope

(Image from the Great Blog of Conservative UAW Guy)

I'd just like to remind liberals, once again, about tolerance. Tolerance is something the LISTENER does, not something the speaker does. So if you don't like what the fellow is saying, you simply ignore the speaker, reassert his right to say it, and go one about your business.

If you wish to respond to the speaker, you can, but remember, your comment should fall within the bounds of another convention liberals don't know a damn thing about: Courtesy.

Check: Liberals and Muslims don't know a damn thing about tolerance and courtesy.

What tolerance is not: It is not tolerant to insist that someone change his view so that they are more palatable to YOU. See, that is INtolerance. The opposite of tolerance.

Muslims, for example, are intolerant. For evidence, see everything.

But I am tolerant because I don't care what Muslims say. Unless, of course, they back their words up with actions and then I think we should nuke the bastards and send them swiftly to Jesus who will condemn their Mohammeden arses to hell.

Now that is tolerance. Lesson over.

PS... Hell: A place without Jesus, filled with liberals and muslims. Forget the eternal fires. Imagine having to be in a place filled with liberals and Muslims. Wait a minute! Wouldn't that be New York City?

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Must be global warming

I've never seen a mushroom this big!!

Here is a shot of its lovely gills.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Mushroom land

This is our crop of pretty mushrooms yesterday.

The top of the mushrooms yesterday

Here are the same mushrooms today.

Also a pair of mushrooms hiding along a cement wall

Monday, September 11, 2006

911 annoyance

I don't want to see film of the idiotic congressmen standing on the Capitol steps singing the National Anthem any more. Those f*ckers didn't protect us and they should have all been lined up in front of a firing squad. Too f*cking late to sing the National Anthem.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

How does it feel?

Network television has been misrepresenting Republicans for 40 years. Now some Clintonistas can't stand it that network television hasn't utterly covered up for them.

Wah! Wah! Wah!

The link

I bet the network will give them a "rebuttal."

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

In other news..

If you are going to have sex with a dead person, why do you need condoms? You tell me.

Now maybe Mike Wallace was correct

... and President Shorty of Iran isn't all bad. I admit I have a certain admiration for him. I mean what an achievement! He's actually going to get the liberals out of the universities. Hope someone is taking notes.

Publishing 101

From a Fox News Update email.

Rule of thumb: Headlines and photos should match.

Rule of thumb #2: Especially if one of the two is about a criminal.

Leaving aside for a moment the question of whether the man who will face the judge is a polygamist or an accused polygamist, we don't have his picture here. We have the photo of John Walsh. Luckily, John Walsh has a relatively famous face and most people know he is not the polygamist in question. Not everyone, of course. There will be a whole bunch of people who now think John Walsh is a polygamist or they will think that the polygamist looks like John Walsh.

In the "It could be worse" department: What if the headline read "Pedophile faces judge." There might be a good lawsuit in that kind of screwup.

Arrest Lara Logan

We managed to get through about five minutes of the KatieNews last night but we turned the channel just about the time Mark Wayne started wondering -- loudly -- why it was that Lara Logan was allowed to betray this country.

He has a point. News babe Lara Logan goes off and plays footsie with the Taliban and.. er... why? To prove she can?

It seems to me Lara Logan is a traitor and she belongs in jail awaiting her death penalty treason trial. That's the only headline I see coming out of KatieNews.

And that was followed by Tom Friedman. So it's the same old thing -- we didn't think otherwise, of course. The news according to the New York Times.

We'll be watching Limbaugh's segment Thursday, but Rush is the ONLY one that could bring us back to network news.